What it is

Cadmium (Cd) is a nonessential, highly toxic heavy metal classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a human carcinogen 1. As a pervasive environmental and industrial toxin, cadmium readily moves through soil-plant systems and possesses a prolonged biological half-life of 16 to 30 years in the human body, enabling significant bioaccumulation over time 2. Unlike essential trace elements, cadmium has no known biological function in humans and persists in the environment through continuous cycling across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Its widespread presence stems from both natural geological processes and extensive anthropogenic activities, including industrial emissions, mining operations, agricultural practices involving contaminated fertilizers, and improper waste disposal 3.

Primary Sources of Cadmium Contamination

The main sources of cadmium contamination in agricultural and aquatic systems are multifaceted. Industrial phosphate fertilizers represent a significant pathway, as they naturally contain elevated cadmium concentrations accumulated from ore deposits 4. Mining and smelting operations generate concentrated releases of cadmium into surrounding soils and water bodies, particularly in nonferrous metal extraction industries 5. Atmospheric deposition from fossil fuel combustion and waste incineration contributes cadmium to the environment through air-soil-water interactions 6. Wastewater irrigation, while addressing water scarcity in developing regions, introduces cadmium directly into agricultural soils, with studies documenting contamination exceeding permissible limits in vegetables and forages 7. Additionally, legacy equipment and industrial blending operations can introduce cadmium through food processing pathways.

Cadmium Speciation and Environmental Behavior

The toxicity and bioavailability of cadmium depend critically on its chemical form and association within environmental matrices 8. In soil, cadmium exists in multiple fractions including exchangeable forms (readily bioavailable), acid-soluble species, oxide-bound forms, organic matter complexes, and residual fractions (least available). Speciation analysis reveals that inorganic cadmium species typically exhibit higher toxicity than organic cadmium compounds 9. The transformation between these forms is controlled by soil pH, redox potential (Eh), and organic matter content. Under neutral to alkaline pH conditions, cadmium tends to precipitate as carbonates or phosphates, reducing its availability. Conversely, acidic soils enhance cadmium solubility and uptake by plants. This dynamic behavior explains why contamination levels vary significantly by location and soil type, even when total cadmium concentrations are comparable.

Global Distribution Patterns and Regional Significance

Cadmium contamination demonstrates distinct geographic patterns, with Asia, particularly China, showing elevated prevalence due to intensive industrial activity and large-scale rice cultivation in historically contaminated regions 10. In developing Asian countries, wastewater irrigation of vegetables creates regional hotspots of contamination, with leafy vegetables consistently accumulating higher cadmium levels than other crop types 11. Non-ferrous metal mining areas in regions like Pakistan, China, and East Africa exhibit severe contamination, with bioaccumulation factors demonstrating how the food chain amplifies environmental exposure. However, cadmium remains a global concern, with detectable levels found in food products worldwide, even in countries with stricter environmental controls. The uneven geographic distribution reflects both natural geological variation and the concentration of industrial activities in certain regions.

Major health concerns

Cadmium exhibits polytropic toxic effects, affecting multiple organ systems through different mechanisms 2. The kidneys represent the primary and most sensitive target organ, where chronic low-dose exposure produces renal tubular damage, glomerulonephritis, and progressive loss of glomerular filtration rate 12. Benchmark dose modeling studies show that early kidney effects occur at urinary cadmium excretion levels far below current safety thresholds, with researchers identifying critical exposure levels of 0.95-3.24% of the currently accepted threshold for various kidney indicators. The skeleton is the second major target, with cadmium interfering with calcium metabolism and causing osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and increased fracture risk 13. Cadmium accumulation in the liver triggers oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and hepatotoxicity through multiple signaling pathways including the PI3K-Akt pathway 14. Reproductive effects include testicular damage affecting spermatogenesis, altered hormone synthesis, and impacts on female fertility and pregnancy outcomes 15.

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Impacts

Emerging evidence demonstrates that cadmium exposure increases cardiovascular disease risk through multiple mechanisms 16. Dose-response meta-analyses show both linear and nonlinear associations depending on the biomarker used (blood vs. urinary cadmium), with increased risk of hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure even at relatively low environmental exposure levels 17. The mechanism involves cadmium's interference with nitric oxide production, leading to impaired vasorelaxation and blood pressure dysregulation. Additionally, low-dose cadmium exposure demonstrates significant associations with metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, with dose-response analyses revealing steep risk escalation at low exposure ranges 18. The steepness of these dose-response curves at low exposures suggests that current safety thresholds may inadequately protect metabolic health in vulnerable populations.

Carcinogenicity and Genotoxic Mechanisms

Cadmium functions as a human carcinogen through both direct and indirect mechanisms 19. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified cadmium as a Group 1 carcinogen based on evidence of lung cancer risk in occupational settings, though epidemiological evidence suggests cadmium may increase risk for multiple cancer types including kidney, pancreas, breast, and prostate cancers. Unlike classical genotoxic carcinogens, cadmium induces malignant transformation through non-mutagenic mechanisms including suppression of apoptotic pathways, activation of epigenetic modifications, and induction of chronic oxidative stress. The delay between exposure and cancer manifestation reflects the chronic nature of cadmium's effects, which accumulate over decades and interact with other environmental and genetic risk factors.

Developmental and Life-Stage Vulnerabilities

Early-life exposure to cadmium presents heightened risks due to developmental plasticity and the sensitivity of critical windows 20. Prenatal cadmium exposure can cross the placenta and accumulate in fetal tissues, potentially inducing hepatic oxidative stress, pancreatic β-cell dysfunction, and epigenetic modifications that persist across generations 21. Children demonstrate greater relative dose exposure due to higher food intake per kilogram of body weight and increased intestinal absorption compared to adults. Studies comparing age groups consistently show that younger populations exhibit higher cadmium body burdens and exceed protective reference values at higher rates 22. The combination of high uptake, limited excretion capacity, and developmental vulnerability establishes children as a population requiring particular protective focus in cadmium risk assessments.

Highest-risk foods or products

Rice serves as the dominant dietary source of cadmium exposure for approximately half the world's population, particularly in Asia 10. The bioaccumulation of cadmium in rice grain exceeds that of most other staple crops, creating concentrated exposure pathways in rice-consuming populations. Studies from China, Indonesia, and other rice-growing regions demonstrate that 39-90% of rice samples exceed benchmark dose thresholds for chronic kidney disease, with some samples presenting lifetime carcinogenic risks. The cadmium concentration in rice grain correlates strongly with soil bioavailable cadmium at the grain-filling stage, influenced by soil pH, water management, and cultivar characteristics. Importantly, cooking practices affect cadmium speciation and bioavailability; boiling rice reduces cadmium content in some cases while increasing lead levels, necessitating comprehensive assessment of thermal processing effects on food safety.

Vegetables, Legumes, and Leafy Greens

Leafy vegetables and certain root crops consistently accumulate cadmium at concentrations exceeding permissible limits in regions with contaminated soils or irrigation water 7. Cruciferous vegetables including cabbage and leafy greens show particularly high bioconcentration factors for cadmium, with studies documenting accumulation reaching 5-7 times higher than in root vegetables. Legumes, while less extensively studied, demonstrate cadmium accumulation patterns dependent on soil properties and cultivar selection. Potatoes show an unusual pattern with higher cadmium in peels than flesh, reflecting the different tissue physiology and transport mechanisms. The translocation factor from soil to edible plant parts varies substantially by species, ranging from 0.04 to over 7, indicating that plant selection and agronomic practices can substantially influence exposure. Home-grown vegetables in contaminated areas present particular risk due to prolonged cultivation on polluted soils and often lack regulatory oversight.

Seafood and Aquatic Products

Aquatic organisms accumulate cadmium through different pathways than terrestrial plants, with molluscs and cephalopods showing particularly high cadmium concentrations 23. Bivalves filter large volumes of water and accumulate cadmium bioavailable in dissolved and particulate forms, creating concentrated exposure through consumption of the entire organism. Fish generally show lower cadmium levels due to active regulation, though specific species and tissues vary considerably. Risk-benefit analyses demonstrate that despite documented cadmium in seafood, the nutritional benefits of fish consumption (omega-3 fatty acids, essential minerals) frequently outweigh health risks from metal contamination at current consumption levels. However, vulnerable populations including children, pregnant women, and those with existing kidney disease face higher risks, and dietary guidance should consider individual risk factors alongside general population benefits.

Processed Foods, Dietary Supplements, and Specialty Products

Processed foods present contamination patterns distinct from raw ingredients, reflecting the effects of manufacturing equipment, ingredient sourcing, and concentration during processing 24. Baby foods and infant formulas show concerning cadmium levels, with some rice products exceeding international standards by 30-89%, creating particular risk for infants whose developing systems cannot yet effectively eliminate cadmium. Mood foods including nuts, chocolate, and herbal preparations frequently exceed permissible limits, with imported samples from specific geographic regions consistently showing higher contamination 25. Dried fruits, particularly dried apples and peaches, accumulate cadmium during concentration processes, while dietary supplements derived from plants grown in contaminated areas present concentrated exposure. Canned products show variable cadmium levels depending on food type and packaging materials, with some evidence suggesting migration from can linings, though interior epoxy coatings generally minimize this pathway. These processed food pathways represent significant exposure for populations with limited access to fresh vegetables or those consuming fortified products as dietary staples.

Testing and speciation notes

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has emerged as the gold standard for cadmium determination in food matrices, offering sensitivity to trace levels (ppb/ppt range) essential for regulatory compliance 26. The technique enables simultaneous multi-element analysis, making it efficient for assessing contamination profiles and interactions between elements. Method development requires careful attention to sample pretreatment, with microwave-assisted digestion in nitric acid or acid-peroxide mixtures standardized across laboratories to ensure comparability. Reference materials and certified standards are essential for validating analytical accuracy, particularly given the bioaccumulation of cadmium in biological matrices. However, challenges including matrix effects from different food compositions, the need for standardization across laboratories, and the cost of equipment limit widespread implementation in developing regions where contamination risk is highest.

Speciation Analysis and Bioavailability Assessment

Speciation analysis employs high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS (HPLC/ICP-MS) or other techniques to differentiate cadmium forms, enabling more accurate health risk assessment 27. While speciation analysis is particularly critical for elements like arsenic where toxicity varies dramatically between chemical forms, its application to cadmium speciation reveals how cadmium association with organic matter, carbonates, oxides, and other soil components affects bioavailability. Bioaccessibility testing using simulated gastrointestinal digestion (in vitro models) demonstrates that total cadmium content overestimates health risk when cadmium is bound in stable complexes with low intestinal absorption 9. For example, mushroom samples with high total cadmium often show minimal bioaccessibility (approximately 6%) due to residual binding, indicating that consumption of such products poses lower risk than total cadmium concentrations would suggest. Integrating speciation and bioaccessibility data produces more accurate dose-response relationships and prevents unnecessary consumption restrictions.

Field-Deployable Screening Technologies

Emerging technologies including laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and paper-based analytical devices offer potential for rapid, on-site screening of cadmium contamination 28. LIBS demonstrates particular promise for high-concentration scenarios, with demonstrated capacity to quantify cadmium across a wide range (70-5000 ppm) in cocoa powder with normalized standard deviations below 10%. These portable approaches enable rapid field-scale monitoring that could support decision-making about irrigation water quality, soil contamination hotspots, and product safety verification. However, these methods generally require laboratory confirmation for regulatory decision-making, as they lack the precision and accuracy required for enforcement of strict standards. The development of portable mass spectrometry and integration with artificial intelligence-based data interpretation could substantially improve capacity for decentralized monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Quality Assurance, Standardization, and Laboratory Comparability

Maintaining analytical quality across laboratories requires standardized protocols, certified reference materials, and regular participation in proficiency testing schemes 29. The National Institute of Standards and Technology and similar organizations worldwide produce botanical, food, and environmental reference materials with assigned cadmium values, enabling laboratories to validate analytical performance. Harmonization of digestion methods, detection conditions, and quality control parameters across regulatory jurisdictions facilitates international trade and protects consumer health across borders. However, significant variation persists in how laboratories prepare samples, handle matrix effects, and report results, particularly in developing regions where older equipment and limited training constrain standardization. The development of global minimum standards for cadmium analysis would strengthen food safety systems and enable more reliable international risk assessments.

Practical reduction strategies

Soil pH manipulation through calcium carbonate (limestone) or calcium hydroxide application represents the most extensively validated and economically practical approach to reducing cadmium bioavailability in contaminated agricultural soils 30. A meta-analysis of 55 studies encompassing 260 field experiments demonstrated that all three lime-based materials (calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide, and calcium oxide) reduced grain cadmium by approximately 45%, operating through dual mechanisms of chemical fixation (transforming cadmium into stable soil forms) and ionic competition (calcium blocking cadmium entry at root membranes). Calcium hydroxide exhibits rapid soil immobilization capacity, reducing bioavailable cadmium by 59%, while calcium carbonate demonstrates superior long-term grain protection (66% reduction) through sustained calcium release synchronized with critical grain-filling stages. Economic analysis revealed calcium carbonate provides 5-10 fold better cost-effectiveness than alternative amendments. This approach's feasibility in large-scale agricultural systems explains its adoption across Asia and its recommendation in international soil remediation frameworks.

Biochar and Nanomaterial-Based Amendments

Biochar and engineered nanoparticle-modified biochar composites offer sustainable approaches to cadmium immobilization, particularly in soils with multiple contamination types 31. Nano-silicon and nano-iron composites combined with biochar reduced bioavailable cadmium by 21%, enhanced soil enzyme activities by 118-139%, and suppressed oxidative stress markers by 67-75% through suppression of reactive oxygen species. Graphene-based nanoparticles achieve particularly high adsorption capacities for cadmium (50-500 mg cadmium per gram of material), with potential for both environmental remediation and in-situ soil amendment 32. Filter cake biochar derived from sugar industry waste reduced soil cadmium from 4.5 to 0.5 mg/kg while simultaneously improving soil fertility through enhanced phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium availability. However, the long-term environmental persistence of nanoparticles and their potential ecotoxicity remain incompletely characterized, requiring further field-scale validation before widespread implementation. The synergistic application of multiple amendment types (biochar with nanoparticles or lime) frequently produces superior results compared to individual amendments.

Phytoremediation and Microbial-Assisted Approaches

Phytoremediation utilizing hyperaccumulating plants or metal-tolerant crops assisted by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting bacteria offers promise for sustainable, low-cost remediation 33. Metal-tolerant bacteria such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas species immobilize cadmium through biosorption, bioprecipitation, and biomineralization, converting mobile cadmium ions into stable, less bioavailable forms. Cadmium reduction of 25-98% has been documented with bacterial consortia, particularly when combined with amendments such as phosphate compounds or biochar. The genetic modification of bacterial strains to enhance sulfur metabolism pathways increased cadmium immobilization efficiency by 36-62% in rice grain compared to wild-type strains 34. Plants like water spinach and Solanum nigrum can accumulate substantial cadmium in aerial tissues when grown in treated soils, enabling biomass removal and externalization of contamination. However, the slow timeframe for phytoremediation (multiple growing seasons) and the need for harvested biomass management limit application to less urgently contaminated sites.

Integrated Management and Agronomic Strategies

Multi-component mitigation approaches combining soil amendments, cultivar selection, water management, and nutritional fortification produce synergistic effects exceeding single interventions 35. Optimized water management in rice paddies regulating soil redox potential to specific ranges (150 to -100 mV) reduces both cadmium mobility and methane emissions, addressing two environmental concerns simultaneously. Breeding programs and genome editing technologies have identified and developed rice cultivars with substantially reduced cadmium uptake (bioconcentration factors reduced by 70-80%), providing long-term solutions compatible with existing agricultural systems 36. Foliar application of zinc, silicon, and various surfactants creates physical barriers reducing cadmium translocation from roots to shoots, with particularly effective approaches including nano-silica combined with surfactants reducing grain cadmium by 50%. Delayed drainage during late grain filling and the use of low-cadmium cultivars, combined with soil liming, provides multiple reinforcing protection mechanisms. These integrated approaches acknowledge that cadmium remediation operates through complex biogeochemical, physiological, and microbial interactions requiring multi-faceted intervention.

How standards approach this

The Codex Alimentarius Commission, European Union, and national food safety authorities have established maximum residue limits (MLs) for cadmium in various food commodities, with limits varying by product type 27. Rice typically faces limits of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg depending on jurisdiction, recognizing rice's particular significance as a cadmium exposure vector. Vegetables, leafy greens, and legumes generally have limits of 0.05-0.1 mg/kg, while processed foods and baby foods face stringent limits reflecting vulnerable population needs. Drinking water standards typically set limits at 0.003-0.005 mg/L, considerably lower than food standards due to continuous daily exposure. These standards vary internationally, reflecting different regulatory philosophies and risk assessment frameworks, which creates challenges for global food trade and consumer protection in regions following lower standards.

Tolerable Daily Intake Derivation and Reference Values

The scientific foundation for cadmium standards rests on tolerable daily intake (TDI) values derived from animal and human studies 37. The European Food Safety Authority established a TDI of 0.83 μg/kg body weight per day based on kidney tubular effects, while other organizations propose values ranging from 0.21 to 1.0 μg/kg body weight per day, reflecting methodological differences and endpoint selection. Recent research demonstrates that these TDI values may inadequately protect public health, particularly for vulnerable populations and sensitive endpoints such as metabolic disease and cardiovascular effects 12. The benchmark dose approach, which identifies exposure levels at which specific adverse effects begin to appear at defined population percentiles, offers more robust derivation of reference values than traditional no-observed-adverse-effect level approaches. Studies consistently demonstrate that current TDI values derived primarily from kidney tubular damage endpoints overlook earlier functional changes including reduced glomerular filtration rate and increased urinary biomarkers detectable at exposures far below current thresholds.

Risk Assessment Methodologies and Health-Based Guidance

Risk assessment for cadmium involves comparing estimated dietary exposure (typically through total diet study surveys or modeling approaches) with health-based guidance values, accounting for life-stage variations in absorption, distribution, and sensitivity 38. Probabilistic risk assessment using Monte Carlo simulation accounts for exposure variability across population subgroups, identifying high-risk segments that deterministic approaches might miss. For example, populations in Guangzhou, China showed that 3-6 year-old children faced health risk with margin of exposure values below 1.0, indicating exceedance of protective thresholds despite overall population mean exposures remaining below guidance values. Cumulative risk assessment integrating exposure to multiple heavy metals recognizes that cadmium frequently co-occurs with lead, arsenic, and other toxicants, with combined health impacts exceeding single-element risk estimates. Life-stage-specific risk assessment demonstrates that infants, children, and pregnant women warrant particular attention, with some studies showing up to 5-fold higher relative dose exposure compared to adult populations.

Benefits of Standardized Testing and Certification Programs

Standardized testing and certification programs such as Heavy Metal Tested and Certified (HMTc) combine feasibility-based limits with rigorous method requirements and sampling protocols, ensuring result comparability across laboratories and reducing inappropriate consumption restrictions 39. These programs confer multiple benefits: they establish scientifically defensible limits reflecting regional baseline contamination and remediation feasibility, require standardized analytical methods enabling quality verification, enforce statistically sound sampling strategies preventing misleading conclusions from unrepresentative samples, and maintain transparent traceability enabling rapid identification and remediation of problematic sources. The integration of these elements produces several advantages over uncoordinated regulatory approaches. First, harmonized standards reduce trade friction while maintaining protective intent. Second, standardized methods enable accurate comparison of contamination levels across regions and time, supporting evidence-based policy development. Third, certification programs provide market incentives for farmers to implement remediation measures that provide documented safety value. Finally, transparent frameworks build consumer confidence in food safety systems, supporting maintenance of dietary diversity essential for nutritional security.

Conclusion

The existing literature reveals several critical gaps requiring future investigation. First, long-term epidemiological studies tracking cadmium exposure trajectories and health outcomes across populations and time periods remain limited, particularly for low-dose metabolic and cardiovascular effects. Second, the development and field-scale validation of synergistic remediation approaches combining multiple technologies requires expansion beyond controlled laboratory conditions. Third, investigation of cadmium-microplastic interactions and emerging contaminants within contaminated food systems represents an emerging priority. Fourth, the translation of bench-scale remediation technologies into economically sustainable implementation in resource-limited agricultural contexts demands interdisciplinary research spanning engineering, economics, and social science. Finally, the development of genomic and biomarker approaches enabling early identification of cadmium-related diseases could substantially improve prevention and intervention strategies in high-exposure populations. These research directions are essential for advancing from current reactive management of cadmium contamination toward predictive prevention and systematic elimination of sources.

Cadmium contamination represents a persistent global health challenge extending from environmental sources through soil-plant-animal systems to human dietary exposure and bioaccumulation. The evidence base demonstrates that cadmium affects multiple organ systems through diverse mechanisms, with health impacts beginning at exposures below current safety thresholds, particularly for vulnerable populations and sensitive endpoints. Rice, vegetables, and certain aquatic products represent dominant dietary vectors, with contamination levels varying substantially by geographic region and farming practices. Modern analytical approaches including speciation analysis and bioaccessibility assessment provide increasingly accurate risk characterization, while diverse remediation strategies including soil amendments, biochar, phytoremediation, and cultivar improvement offer feasible pathways toward reducing contamination. Regulatory frameworks continue evolving, with growing recognition that integrated, multi-stakeholder approaches combining environmental remediation, agricultural modification, and consumer guidance provide more sustainable solutions than single-intervention approaches. Future advancement requires sustained research investment, standardization of monitoring approaches, and meaningful implementation of evidence-based strategies at scale.

References

  1. [1] A. Charkiewicz, W. Omeljaniuk, K. Nowak, M. Garley, and J. Nikliski, "Cadmium Toxicity and Health EffectsA Brief Summary," Molecules, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28186620
  2. [2] S. V. Kuzmin, V. N. Rusakov, A. G. Setko, and O. Sinitsyna, "Toxicological and Hygienic Aspects of the Dietary Cadmium Intake andIts Human Health Effects: A Literature Review," - / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2024-32-7-49-57
  3. [3] B. Laoye, P. Olagbemide, T. Ogunnusi, and O. Akpor, "Heavy Metal Contamination: Sources, Health Impacts, and Sustainable Mitigation Strategies with Insights from Nigerian Case Studies," F1000Research, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.160148.4
  4. [4] M. U. Aslam et al., "ASSESSMENT OF CADMIUM LEVELS IN SELECTED LOCAL AND IMPORTED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN MULTAN PAKISTAN: A STUDY ON HEALTH RISKS," Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.71000/xz52hh14
  5. [5] B. Du et al., "Environmental and human health risks from cadmium exposure near an active lead-zinc mine and a copper smelter, China.," Science of the Total Environment, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137585
  6. [6] P. B. Angon et al., "Sources, effects and present perspectives of heavy metals contamination: Soil, plants and human food chain," Heliyon, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28357
  7. [7] Y. A. Hamoud et al., "Cadmium and lead accumulation in important food crops due to wastewater irrigation: Pollution index and health risks assessment," Heliyon, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24712
  8. [8] M. M et al., "Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Food: Implications for Human Health and Environmental Safety.," Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/toxics13050333
  9. [9] L. P, W. X, C. W, and Y. Y, "Integrating Speciation Analysis and Bioaccessibility to Reassess Cadmium Exposure Risk from Six Mushrooms.," Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/toxics14010066
  10. [10] C. H et al., "Assessing the health risks of rice cadmium content standards in China.," Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw4382
  11. [11] N. Kaur et al., "Heavy metal contamination in wastewater-irrigated vegetables: assessing food safety challenges in developing Asian countries.," Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, May 2025, doi: 10.1039/d4em00565a
  12. [12] S. Satarug, "Benchmark dose modeling to define permissible exposure levels for environmental cadmium," Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.20517/jeea.2025.29
  13. [13] H. S and Z. K, "Cadmium-Induced Bone Toxicity: Deciphering the Osteoclast-Osteoblast Crosstalk.," Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/biology14081051
  14. [14] W. N, J. X, C. X, Z. B, C. J, and Z. Z, "Integrated Network Toxicology and Transcriptomics Reveal Molecular Mechanisms of Cadmium-Exposed Liver Injury in Swine.," Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/ani16030414
  15. [15] S. Kumar and A. Sharma, "Cadmium toxicity: effects on human reproduction and fertility," Reviews on Environmental Health, May 2019, doi: 10.1515/reveh-2019-0016
  16. [16] P. Verzelloni, T. Urbano, L. A. Wise, M. Vinceti, and T. Filippini, "Cadmium exposure and cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.," Environmental Pollution, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123462
  17. [17] P. Verzelloni et al., "Cadmium exposure and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.," Environmental Research, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120014
  18. [18] H. Feng, S. Ruzita, and R. Hussien, "Research on the Dose Response Relationship between Metabolic Diseases and Cadmium Exposure Based on Urinary Biomarker Detection," International journal of research and innovation in social science, 2025, doi: 10.47772/ijriss.2025.907000262
  19. [19] A. Cirovic and S. Satarug, "Toxicity Tolerance in the Carcinogenesis of Environmental Cadmium," International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25031851
  20. [20] D.-V. C et al., "Pediatric Heavy-Metal Exposome and Chronic Disease Trajectories: From Neurodevelopment to Metabolic and Endocrine Outcomes," Jan. 2026, doi: 10.20944/preprints202601.0267.v1
  21. [21] S. Saedi, S. E. Watson, J. L. Young, Y. Tan, K. Wintergerst, and L. Cai, "Does maternal low-dose cadmium exposure increase the risk of offspring to develop metabolic syndrome and/or type 2 diabetes?," Life Science, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121385
  22. [22] F. Mhungu et al., "Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Dietary Exposure to Cadmium in Residents of Guangzhou, ChinaYoung Children Potentially at a Health Risk," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159572
  23. [23] X. H, N. R, L. Dc, Z. Y, T. J, and Z. W, "Heavy metal risks in aquatic foods.," Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109831
  24. [24] C.-L. S et al., "Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Processed Baby Foods and Infant Formulas Worldwide: A Scoping Review.," Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf138
  25. [25] D. Jakkielska, B. Topolska, J. Wolska, I. Kurzyca, M. Frankowski, and A. Zioa-Frankowska, "Heavy metals and metalloids in selected Mood Foods in Poland: Development of sample preparation and analysis methods and assessment of the health risks of consumption.," Food and Chemical Toxicology, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2025.115746
  26. [26] M. Huang and X. Li, "Quantitative Detection of Toxic Elements in Food Samples by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)," Processes, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/pr13103361
  27. [27] D. Zhao, P. Wang, and F.-J. Zhao, "Toxic Metals and Metalloids in Food: Current Status, Health Risks, and Mitigation Strategies," Current Environmental Health Reports, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00462-7
  28. [28] J. M. M. et al., "Assessing the Sensitivity and Efficiency of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) for High-Concentration Cadmium Detection in Cocoa Powder," Italian National Conference on Sensors, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25082434
  29. [29] F. S. J, K. Aj, G. Pj, and W. Sa, "Determination of Toxic Elements in Botanical Dietary Supplement Ingredient Reference Materials.," Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsae064
  30. [30] J. Qin et al., "Mechanistic Pathways Controlling Cadmium Bioavailability and Ecotoxicity in Agricultural Systems: A Global Meta-Analysis of Lime Amendment Strategies," Biology, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/biology15030207
  31. [31] M. U. Yasin et al., "Nano-engineered biochar enhances soil microbial interactions and maize transcriptomic pathways for cadmium detoxification.," Journal of Hazardous Materials, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139029
  32. [32] T. Ag, E. E, and R. Ss, "Potential of Graphene Nanoparticles for Reducing Cadmium Toxicity and Environmental Contamination.," Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1155/jt/7838711
  33. [33] Y. Huang et al., "Exceptional anti-toxic growth of water spinach in arsenic and cadmium co-contaminated soil remediated using biochar loaded with Bacillus aryabhattai.," Journal of Hazardous Materials, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133966
  34. [34] L. Z et al., "Genetic manipulation of cysH/cysJ in Citrobacter sp. XT1-2-2 enhanced cadmium immobilization by regulating metabolic pathways.," Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1128/aem.00856-25
  35. [35] G. Qi et al., "Greenhouse gas emission and cadmium contamination in rice paddies: research progresses in trade-off relationships, influencing factors and synergistic mitigation measures," Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1698002
  36. [36] J. Wang, B. Wu, L. Zhou, K. Liu, A. You, and W. Zha, "Cadmium Contamination in Asian Rice (Oryza sativa L.): Mechanistic Insights from Soil Sources to Grain Accumulation and Mitigation Strategies," Plants, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/plants14182844
  37. [37] D. V. Suvorov et al., "Clarification of tolerable daily intake of cadmium with food products based on health risk criteria," Health Risk Analysis, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2025.4.07
  38. [38] S. Kirini et al., "Lead and cadmium in foods/drinking water from Slovenian market/taps: Estimation of overall chronic dietary exposure and health risks," Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/19440049.2019.1628355
  39. [39] Z. Q, D. W, W. Z, X. X, and J. T, "Safety Risk Assessment and Classification of Cadmium in Grain Processing Products.," May 2025, doi: 10.3390/foods14111882